Question on OSI position on BSD/MIT licenses

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

"Chris Travers" <chris.travers at gmail.com> writes:
> Would OSI's position be that projects using unapproved variants on these
> licenses for historical reasons (PostgreSQL for example uses an old-style
> BSD license with the advertising clause dropped) are not open source?

How about doing your own homework?  The "old-style BSD license with
the advertising clause dropped" is OSI-approved (under the name "New
BSD license").  So is the MIT license.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no