For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)

[Zak Greant]

On 11/12/07, David Woolley <forums at david-woolley.me.uk> wrote:
> Zak Greant wrote:
>
> > I don't believe that this disjunction of licenses needs to be approved
> > or codified.
>
> It wasn't a simple user choice.  The selection is based on whether or
> not the work as a whole is under the GPL.

I should have stayed away from the term disjunction - it can be used
in several senses and may be confusing. Heck, I had to look it up to
ensure I was using it properly.

Regardless of terminology used, this still doesn't need to be approved
or codified, IMHO.

--zak