For Approval: Educational Community License 1.0

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Mon May 7 18:37:15 UTC 2007

Christopher D.Coppola wrote:
> Without approval we'd necessarily need to stay
> with ECL 1.0 which negates the benefits of our diligent contribution
> agreement practices and does nothing for patent grants.

As I mentioned earlier, the word "use" in ECL 1.0 arguably constitutes a
broad patent grant.  So from this perspective ECL 2.0 does grant less.

Matt Flaschen

More information about the License-discuss mailing list