License Committee Report for July 2007

Rick Moen rick at
Tue Jul 31 02:49:06 UTC 2007

Quoting Michael Poole (mdpoole at

> If you don't like what the process requires, amend the process.
> Timothy McIntyre sharly made the point that the OSI "requires
> compliance" with those procedures.  I followed them.

No, not really.  Thus my point, in fact.

> > An almost 100% total success at failing to cover licence compatibility.
> Again, if you do not like the procedure, amend it. 

Again, not that it's a big thing, but you didn't actually _follow_ that

You're welcome to ignore OSI's requested procedure, and even to waste
our time berating it as "bureaucracy" (I guess), but berating it and then
claiming to have satisfied it when, in fact, you ignored the parts
requiring actual work, is just a bit much. 

More information about the License-discuss mailing list