LGPL 2.1 + GPL 3 = problems?
arnoud at engelfriet.net
Sun Jul 15 12:46:24 UTC 2007
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> > What I meant is that you can apply the terms of the GPL to any
> > LGPL work instead of the LGPL terms. See LGPL 2 section 3, first sentence.
> Wrong! Not any version of the GPL, unless otherwise specified in an
> additional permission in the copyright notice of your library, or specified
> explicitly in a later version of the ***LGPL*** (***and*** your library
I did not say "any version of the GPL".
"You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library."
This is verbatim from LGPL version 2.1, section 3, first sentence.
I fail to see what this has to do with additional permissions.
Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself
Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
Arnoud blogt nu ook: http://blog.iusmentis.com/
More information about the License-discuss