InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Wed Jan 31 01:26:18 UTC 2007
Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
> Since I assisted Ross with the submission to OSI, I think the list
> should be aware that the submission was meant to get an attribution
> provision approved that would work in a variety of circumstances to
> avoid numerous licenses with slightly different "attribution"
> provisions. Our goal was to get a standard approach rather than having
> each company submit a different version of attribution (please note that
> the SugarCRM attribution provision varies from Zimbra attribution
Yes, but what I thought was disingenuous is that GAP did not resemble
*any* of the MPL+ licenses.
> Since virtually all OSI approved licenses do not permit
> modifications, we thought that the number of licenses that would be
> effected would be small and this approach was the best for the industry.
> Clearly based on the comments, this approach does not have support. We
> are revising the attribution provision and Socialtext will be submitting
> it as part of the MPL.
They should still make it generic (i.e. not Socialtext specific), but I
do think people prefer an actual license.
> The submission will include significant additional changes to
> attribution provision to reflect the other concerns expressed on the
> list. The summary on buni.org was particularly helpful in focusing us on
> the problems with GAP and we want to thank those who contributed to it.
Thank you for attempting to address our concerns.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss