[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]

[Matthew Flaschen]

Rick Moen wrote:
> I said that there is nothing _inherently_ wrong (for values of "wrong"
> entailing contravening the letter or spirit of the OSD) with licences
> that require -some- displayed advertising crediting the original
> copyright holder.  It _should_ be possible, I think, to draft such a
> licence that reasonable people consider not to violate OSD #6 by
> substantively permitting full usage of the codebase for all purposes
> especially including commerce by third parties.

Indeed, that's just what GPL 2c does.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070122/9aa6f1be/attachment.sig>