[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sun Jan 21 00:57:27 UTC 2007
Ben Tilly wrote:
> You still haven't touched on an area of disagreement.
> The disagreement lies with the point that you haven't yet addressed.
> Which is whether they've gone so far doing this that they are
> violating OSD #6. In my opinion, they have not. In my further
> opinion, the Attribution Assurance License raises the exact potential
> same OSD #6 issues, and the Board decided to allow it. (Note that OSD
> #6 was in the definition when they made that decision.) I suspect
> they allowed it for the same reason that I would.
Not quite. AAL doesn't allow an arbitrary logo, but only three
well-defined text phrases.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss