[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]

[Matthew Flaschen]

Ben Tilly wrote:
> You still haven't touched on an area of disagreement.
> 
> The disagreement lies with the point that you haven't yet addressed.
> Which is whether they've gone so far doing this that they are
> violating OSD #6.  In my opinion, they have not.  In my further
> opinion, the Attribution Assurance License raises the exact potential
> same OSD #6 issues, and the Board decided to allow it.  (Note that OSD
> #6 was in the definition when they made that decision.)  I suspect
> they allowed it for the same reason that I would.

Not quite.  AAL doesn't allow an arbitrary logo, but only three
well-defined text phrases.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070120/ec68e7e4/attachment.sig>