SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments

[Matthew Flaschen]

Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Timothy McIntyre (tmcintyre at terracottatech.com):
> 
>> Essentially, I think the SocialText license should be approved for the 
>> same reasons that the OSI approved the Attribution Assurance License. 
> 
> You mean, for the "reason" of having not, at that time, yet gotten around
> to writing OSD provision #10?  That reason would seem to no longer apply.

Not to mention the subtle yet significant differences between AAL and
GAP that I reviewed earlier
(http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:msp:12136:ccpbmhndbgpfnpnikjbp).

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070119/d46fa94d/attachment.sig>