SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sat Jan 20 01:30:05 UTC 2007
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Timothy McIntyre (tmcintyre at terracottatech.com):
>> Essentially, I think the SocialText license should be approved for the
>> same reasons that the OSI approved the Attribution Assurance License.
> You mean, for the "reason" of having not, at that time, yet gotten around
> to writing OSD provision #10? That reason would seem to no longer apply.
Not to mention the subtle yet significant differences between AAL and
GAP that I reviewed earlier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss