SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Sat Jan 20 01:30:05 UTC 2007

Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Timothy McIntyre (tmcintyre at
>> Essentially, I think the SocialText license should be approved for the 
>> same reasons that the OSI approved the Attribution Assurance License. 
> You mean, for the "reason" of having not, at that time, yet gotten around
> to writing OSD provision #10?  That reason would seem to no longer apply.

Not to mention the subtle yet significant differences between AAL and
GAP that I reviewed earlier

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list