Dynamic linking, was: Re: Dispelling BSD License Misconceptions
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Fri Jan 19 05:32:33 UTC 2007
Ben Tilly wrote:
>> I'm not sure about this one. I'm also still confused what you mean by
>> "the author of Term::ReadLine::Gnu may be overstepping". Who is
>> overstepping, and why?
> Well I think the third is probably derivative. But the author of that
> code thinks he can dual license it Artistic and GPL. Which means that
> he either hasn't paid enough attention to readline's copyright
> license, or doesn't think that his work is derivative.
Right, I see what you mean now. Of course he simply may not know what
the License of Perl really is.
> Hence he may be overstepping - asserting that he has a right to apply
> a license that he may not.
> About the one you're not sure of, most Perl code does not even *load*
> Term::ReadLine. That's not going to be derivative.
> Of code that does
> load it, most uses only the Term::ReadLine API. I think we're agreed
> that that is unlikely to be derivative. But the tiny portion of
> fraction that specifically loads Term::ReadLine::Gnu and then heavily
> uses parts of the API that are specific to readline - there probably
> is some code that might be argued to be derivative of readline.
I think code that uses Term::ReadLine::Gnu , directly or indirectly,
will probably be a derivative work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss