matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Wed Jan 17 19:05:01 UTC 2007
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Right but the GPL does not require acceptance of the license to RUN it
> and the v3 explicitly states that. Thus w/no acceptance, how is the
> disclaimer binding?
Like I said, the disclaimer is in the *notice* as well as the license.
And as others have reiterated, it makes no sense to accept a disclaimer.
It's a unilateral statement.
P.S. GPLv2 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" so
acceptance of it isn't required for running either.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss