GPL

[Matthew Flaschen]

Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Right but the GPL does not require acceptance of the license to RUN it
> and the v3 explicitly states that.  Thus w/no acceptance, how is the
> disclaimer binding?

Like I said, the disclaimer is in the *notice* as well as the license.
And as others have reiterated, it makes no sense to accept a disclaimer.
 It's a unilateral statement.

P.S. GPLv2 says "The act of running the Program is not restricted" so
acceptance of it isn't required for running either.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070117/5e286cd7/attachment.sig>