Which license to use?

[Matthew Flaschen]

David Woolley wrote:
> That would prevent the use of the mark on GPLed software supplied as
> binaries for proprietary operating systems!

  I would expect there to
> the same exemption as in the GPL, namely that components normally 
> supplied with the OS or its development system would be allowed.

Yes, I suppose I spoke too broadly.  Such components don't need to have
source available.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070112/5943cd90/attachment.sig>