[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]

[DShofi at atmi.com]

Russ Nelson wrote:

> Then you are in favor of "open source" having multiple conflicting
> definitions, which will diminish and dilute the term.

I am in favor of the OSI serving its purpose without putting prior 
restraints on software developers who want to participate in the open 
source community.  That purpose is to provide expert consultation (before 
or after publication) and address THE open source definition 
incompatibility, if need be. 

David M. Shofi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070105/b6b7f99c/attachment.html>