Use of "open source"
rick at linuxmafia.com
Thu Jan 4 08:44:02 UTC 2007
Quoting Matthew Flaschen (matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu):
> Yes, I really shouldn't mix those up. Part of it is that the OSI site
> says, "Unfortunately, the term "open source" itself is subject to
> misuse, and because it's descriptive, it can't be protected as a
> trademark (which would have been our first choice)."
> (http://opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.php). Still, I don't
> think OSI is really prepared to litigate over the "open source" term
Well said, and I have to admit that I was stretching the point: OSI
hasn't acted, in general, in ways trademark holders should concerning
the term "open source" if it were to seriously contemplate enforcing
that as a commercial mark under trademark law. However, that of course
is entirely irrelevant to the legitimacy of OSI's custody.
Cheers, "By reading this sentence, you agree to be bound by the
Rick Moen terms of the Internet Protocol, version 4, or, at your
rick at linuxmafia.com option, any later version." -- Seth David Schoen
More information about the License-discuss