For Approval: GPLv3

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Fri Aug 31 11:47:49 UTC 2007

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at> wrote:
> [...]
>> Where exactly does GPLv2 say explicitly it is not a contract?  The
>> situation hasn't changed at all in GPLv3.  As far as I know, the FSF
>> stills views it as a license, but this isn't directly stated in either
> When defending itself in Wallace v. FSF lawsuit, the Free Software
> Foundation went on record with this:

You've totally ignored my point, which was that neither
 GPLv2 nor GPLv3 said GPL was not a contract.

Matt Flaschen

More information about the License-discuss mailing list