Proposal for change to OSD#9
josef.assad at gmail.com
Sun Aug 26 18:34:33 UTC 2007
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:39:13 -0700
Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Nils Labugt (elabu at online.no):
> > OSD#9 does not define "other software".
> I don't see that as a problem. Never before recently have I seen
> anyone find a way to understand that provision's meaning, and one
> suspects in the recent case that the lack of comprehension was
> somewhat willful.
A certain claim that a browser was integral to the OS comes to mind...
I agree that pinning down what "other software" means is problematic.
I'd be curious to know what specific scenarios you had in mind to cover
The Banjo Players Must Die!
More information about the License-discuss