MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Thu Aug 23 23:34:41 UTC 2007
Chris Travers wrote:
> I thought this was a list for discussing licenses in general.
It's not, officially. It's a list for discussing whether licenses meet
the Open Source Definition and whether they should be approved. Now,
we're all guilty of being off-topic at times, but we try to keep it to a
minimum. Alex seems to be here specifically to criticize the FSF.
> The subject has been changed to reflect the changed topic, so what exactly is your
Alex's topic is not MS-PL/GPL compatibility. Alex's topic is how he
thinks the FSF's interpretation of what derivative works are likely to
be is wrong.
More information about the License-discuss