MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Thu Aug 23 23:30:01 UTC 2007
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu> wrote:
>> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>>>> The GPL only applies to derivative works under U.S. copyright law. If
>>> Yeah, right.
>> I should have said, "It only applies to derivative works or equivalent
>> under copyright law". If everything is happening in the U.S., the U.S.
>> concept of derivative work is what counts.
> Ten bottles of best German beer to you if you'll manage to get
> FSF/SFLC go on record with that regarding GPLv3 and confirm that bits
> like "the source code for shared libraries and dynamically linked
> subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require, such as
> by intimate data communication or control flow between those
> subprograms and other parts of the work" is nothing but drivel about
> derivative works under Copyleft Act in the GNU Republic.
It's their interpretation of what derivative works may include. No one
said you can't have your own.
More information about the License-discuss