MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Thu Aug 23 20:05:26 UTC 2007
Chris Travers wrote:
> If one is *required* to restrict, why are additional permissions
> specifically excluded from the terms that can be removed?
They're not excluded. It also says "When you convey a copy of a covered
work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from that
copy, or from any part of it."
More information about the License-discuss