MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Thu Aug 23 20:26:15 UTC 2007
John Cowan wrote:
> Definitely. It's a derivative work, and the MS-PL says you can make
> those freely
I don't know about freely. It of course says, "each contributor grants
you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free copyright license to [...]
prepare derivative works of its contribution, and distribute [...] any
derivative works that you create."
However, this is "Subject to the [...] limitations in section 3". One
of those limitations is: "If you distribute any portion of the software
in source code form, you may do so only under this license"
>, and the Copyright Act says you can license them however
> you like, provided your making the derivative work in the first place
> was lawful.
And the question I think is whether the license permits making a
derivative work licensed as a whole under the GPL. I think the
limitation I named forbids this.
More information about the License-discuss