Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)

Simon Phipps webmink at
Thu Aug 23 17:14:01 UTC 2007

On Aug 23, 2007, at 17:58, Mike Milinkovich wrote:

> And I do not think that I or anyone else have said that "...  
> Microsoft are
> "playing by the rules and deserve to be rewarded"...". What I am  
> saying is
> that Microsoft are playing by the rules and should expect to be  
> treated like
> any other organization playing by the rules. How you can portray  
> that as
> special treatment is beyond me.

Actually, Mike, I was agreeing with you (I realise that feels odd).  
It was others in other postings on the list who have commented that  
Microsoft should be rewarded for not ignoring OSI.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list