Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)

[Simon Phipps]

On Aug 23, 2007, at 17:58, Mike Milinkovich wrote:

> And I do not think that I or anyone else have said that "...  
> Microsoft are
> "playing by the rules and deserve to be rewarded"...". What I am  
> saying is
> that Microsoft are playing by the rules and should expect to be  
> treated like
> any other organization playing by the rules. How you can portray  
> that as
> special treatment is beyond me.

Actually, Mike, I was agreeing with you (I realise that feels odd).  
It was others in other postings on the list who have commented that  
Microsoft should be rewarded for not ignoring OSI.

S.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070823/333983d4/attachment.p7s>