For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License

[Chris Travers]

Nils Labugt wrote:
>
> I would read "only under this license" as "under this license and not
> under any other license".
>   
That is an odd reading of a license that doesn't require, say, the 
distribution of source code at all (as noted by the conditional).  That 
seems to suggest that binary-only distributions with standard EULA's are 
acceptable forms of distribution...

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: chris.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070819/41ce0051/attachment.vcf>