For Approval: GPLv3
chris at metatrontech.com
Thu Aug 16 01:29:00 UTC 2007
Just to be clear---
my concern is that we have to decide where exactly to draw the line wrt
discrimination against fields of endeavor. Either we take the line that
"if the license does not explicitly name any such fields, then it is not
discriminatory" or we take the line that "discrimination may be
explicitly state or implied, or simply collateral damage of the license."
If we take the former case here and approve the GPL v3 without
specifying exactly what this means *now* then we will have a harder time
when someone wants to take it further and we will be stuck with a "don't
ask, don't tell" policy on this portion of the OSD.
In short if the GPL v3 is approved, I think it is *absolutely mandatory*
that this section be clarified not only in rationale but as to where the
line is actually drawn, and whether exceptions are going to be made
allowing discrimination of certain fields of endeavor such as DRM.
If we are going to do this, let us at least *try* to contain the erosion
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 171 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss