For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sat Aug 11 02:46:47 UTC 2007
Donovan Hawkins wrote:
> However, I think omitting a provision like clause 13 of the MPL is more problematic if it leads
> people to avoid releasing under multiple licenses.
That clause is really completely unnecessary. Most OSI-approved
licenses don't have it, and the copyright holder doesn't need it to be
able to dual-license.
More information about the License-discuss