conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at
Fri Aug 3 18:26:32 UTC 2007

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:20:47PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> Since GStreamer apparently can't remain (under LGPL) it must be a
> derivative of Totem, right?

The FSF argument is that Totem is a derivative of gstreamer. The LGPL 
would then require Totem to be under restrictions that are not present 
in the GPL. This presents a conflict, so instead gstreamer is treated as 
if it's GPLed. I don't think anyone would claim that the library is a 
derivative work of the application that uses it.

Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list