LGPLv3 and GPLv2 incompatibility

[David Woolley]

Wilson, Andrew wrote:

> allowing a GPLv2/LPGLv3 combined work by allowing such a
> combined work to be governed by GPLv2's copyleft under LGPLv3.

Which would allow trivial downgrading any V3 licensed code by adding V2 
code with no real purpose other than to benefit from the proposed 
special case.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.