Restriction on distribution by Novell?
Matthew Garrett
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Wed Sep 27 20:43:39 UTC 2006
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:25:13PM -0400, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> That's incorrect. Berne recognizes quotation rights, which are the same
> thing. Besides, national laws do recognize it, and thus people can take
> advantage.
If you can point me to the section of UK copyright law that allows this
sort of fair use, I'd be slightly surprised - the relevant law is
chapter 3 of
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880048_en_1.htm . The only
quotation rights apply to criticism or review (section 30) - I don't see
any way in which a patch could fall into that category.
US fair use law is probably one of the most liberal varients, and UK law
probably one of the more restrictive. Individual countries may fall
anywhere in-between. You really can't rely on fair use providing you
with any useful software-related rights unless you're limiting your
scope to a small number of countries.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list