APL license - What about the enforced logos?

[Matthew Flaschen]

Rick Moen wrote:
> Claiming it's parody isn't an effective
> defence, nor does it matter that your usage was non-commercial.  It's a
> tort.

Wouldn't any parody fall afoul of this, though?

> [1] Alongside infringement and _dilution_, which I forgot to detail:

I didn't know these two violations were distinct, either.

> Ordinarily, proving trademark infringment requires showing likelihood of
> confusion.

I thought this was supposed to be the *only* justification for trademark
protection (protecting the consumer from confusion).

Matt Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20061129/17bc254e/attachment.sig>