APL license - What about the enforced logos?
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Wed Nov 29 23:12:19 UTC 2006
Matthew Flaschen scripsit:
> Well, I don't know about a *strong* trademark. A district court judge
> found, "serious questions regarding whether 'Windows' is a non-generic
> name and thus eligible for the protections of federal trademark law."
> (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/62546_lindows16.shtml) in the
> Lindows case. Still, it's strong enough to threaten with(for now).
It's not the trademark that's strong, it's the $40 billion in cash.
With that, you can make even the most specious legal theory effective
enough to get your opponent to go away -- Linspire is not using the
Lindows name today.
--
You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan
than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
graphs; you have a right to be here. cowan at ccil.org
--DeXiderata by Sean McGrath
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list