"Biological Open Source"
Michael Bernstein
webmaven at cox.net
Fri Nov 17 02:35:50 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:57 +1100, Janet Hope wrote:
> Note that I've put "or any improvement to Biotech Process" in square
> brackets. That's to indicate that if I left that part out, it would
> be an academic or permissive style of licence, but if I included it,
> it would be a reciprocal or copyleft style of licence. Is that
> correct?
Seems to me that an equivalent to a strong reciprocal license would say
"or any patented improvement to Biotech Process unless they are also
licensed under the JBPPNAC."
IANAL, TINLA.
- Michael R. Bernstein
michaelbernstein.com
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list