APL license - What about the enforced logos?

Rick Moen rick at linuxmafia.com
Mon Nov 13 03:20:13 UTC 2006

Quoting Matthew Flaschen (matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu):

> No, in fact it does require one.

Ah, well, so much for heeding context. 

> Originally, I was *only* referring the legal effect of the license.

That would be the point I addressed.  You all caught up, now?

> The big problem with that is that computerists don't have this so-called
> common sense.

I suggest learning -- especially if one is going to go around making
claims about what licences require, and aspires to not look foolish in
public and waste other people's time.

More information about the License-discuss mailing list