licensing query
Matthew Flaschen
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sun Nov 12 00:12:53 UTC 2006
That's correct, but I recommend you simply disavow compilation copyright
in writing (essentially releasing it into the public domain).
Otherwise, you need to come up with a separate license for that.
Matthew Flaschen
David Woolley wrote:
> You will need to treat it as a collective work and license the component
> parts separately from the compilation copyright. If you need more
> integration than that, you may have licensing conflict, and you will
> have to negotiate with the copyrightowners as you would have to do
> for more commercial input to a document.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20061111/0977c5b5/attachment.sig>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list