APL license - What about the enforced logos?
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
Wed Nov 8 09:41:35 UTC 2006
Quoting David Woolley (david at djwhome.demon.co.uk):
> I believe that the problem being highlighted is that the actual
> copyright ownership may be a composite of Alfresco's and subsequent
> contributors', but this requirement can result in the notice not
> being allowed to include notice of the subsequent contributions, thus
> misrepresenting the true copyright ownership.
Not allowing a property holder to indicate his/her property would be,
to be blunt, mildly insane and clearly contrary to public policy and
the general intent of copyright law. Why would you think a judge would
interpret the licence that way, or, if he/she did so, hold it to be
enforceable?
(Even joint or collective works are subject to multiple copyright
notices, quite routinely.)
> Another problem is that it would reset the copyright date, which,
> as the copyright is corporate, would purport to extend the life of
> Alfresco's copyright.
I confess I am sadly ignorant of any mechanism other than statute by
which copyright date might be 'reset'.
> Finally, if one interprets this as referring to the licence grant, rather
> than the copyright notice, it means that the licence can be modified
> or revoked.
You'll want to look up 'promisorry estoppel' at this point, among other
things.
> I thought that a judge's job in this respect was to try to determine,
> on the balance of probability, what the licence drafter's intentions
> were. On my reading of the material quoted, I think it is clear that
> they, did require the visibility and presence of hyperlinks that
> could only really be achieved by having a GUI.
Fortunately, I think most judges are more familiar with the term 'if
any' and 'if applicable' than are the Asperger's poster children so
famously prominent among us.
--
Cheers, Higgeldy Piggeldy "Phooey on Freud and his
Rick Moen Hamlet of Elsinore Psychoanalysis --
rick at linuxmafia.com Ruffled the critics by Oedipus, Schmoedipus,
Dropping this bomb: I just loved Mom."
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list