[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Sat Dec 16 22:03:00 UTC 2006
Michael Tiemann wrote:
> And if you do,
> I'll consider that to be open source for me, and I'll live by all those
> open source rules, including copyright and proper attribution, whether I
> redistribute, modify, build services that integrate with your services,
> or run the code as a service myself."
What's wrong with making this arrangement explicit through a license
(roughly) along the license of the Affero GPL? I think it's too early
to approve such a license, but the basic idea makes sense to me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss