[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]

[Matthew Flaschen]

Michael Tiemann wrote:

> And if you do,
> I'll consider that to be open source for me, and I'll live by all those
> open source rules, including copyright and proper attribution, whether I
> redistribute, modify, build services that integrate with your services,
> or run the code as a service myself."

What's wrong with making this arrangement explicit through a license
(roughly) along the license of the Affero GPL?  I think it's too early
to approve such a license, but the basic idea makes sense to me.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20061216/4ba4c421/attachment.sig>