[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Fri Dec 15 23:27:12 UTC 2006
Rick Moen wrote:
> Your point might clearer if you'd quote relevant material from the
> preceding thread, but unfortunately you did not in the post to which I
My mistake. I thought I had.
> In any event, this is starting to get extremely silly: A codebase under
> GPLv2 with some specific geographic-restriction addendum based on clause
> #8 is _not_, in fact, under the same licence as one under GPLv2 without
> that additional clause.
I agree. I was just pointing out that this *was* a copyright issue. I
wasn't the one who brought up clause 8 to begin with. Now we're done. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss