andrew.wilson at intel.com
Wed Sep 14 17:43:05 UTC 2005
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> I do *not* think the ID ought to release a proprietary version of the
> containing significant changes made by someone else without a written
> instrument from that someone.
I agree. My concerns about OVPL could be addressed by making sec. 3.3
and allowing a licensee to opt in by returning a signed copy to the ID.
Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the License-discuss