When can licenses be revoked? (was: License Proliferation)
alex at alex.org.uk
Fri Sep 9 17:35:08 UTC 2005
--On 09 September 2005 10:13 -0700 Ben Tilly <btilly at gmail.com> wrote:
> Out of curiousity, what happens someone revokes a license and that
> revocation is OK in their jurisdiction, but not the jurisdiction that
> a user of their software happens to be living in? As a US resident
> this would be particularly interesting for me if the US courts think
> that copyright licenses are always unrevokable.
It would depend solely on the governing law of the license, I would
have thought. Which is a different can of worms.
> Out of further curiousity, "the presence of consideration" is a term
> that I'd have trouble accurately interpreting. For instance could
> there be consideration with the GPL because one has the potential of
> getting back improvements (even though there is obviously no
I would have thought the normal rules of consideration apply - there would
have to be an obligation upon the licensee. Any obligation on the licensee
is thus likely to count, including the acceptance of liability limitation.
> Anyways, if I understand this conversation correctly, an open source
> copyright license, once given, might be revokable. However when it
> may be revoked is fairly unclear, and is likely to vary by
> jurisdiction. It also doesn't seem to be a well discussed topic. Is
> that impression accurate?
You are correct that it is unclear :-)
More information about the License-discuss