License Committee Report for September 2005
dbarrett at quinthar.com
Thu Sep 8 21:08:40 UTC 2005
Russell Nelson wrote:
> The OVPL consists of two sets of changes to the CDDL. One set changes
> policy, and the other set changes implementation. I have suggested
> that in order for the OVPL to not be duplicative and to increase its
> readability, its implementation changes should actually go into the
> CDDL. I've asked the submittor to work with the CDDL stewards to get
> those improvements into the CDDL. I have not gotten any cooperation.
> Instead, he has asked me to submit the OVPL as-is.
Incidentally, I think this is a fair summary, but I would suggest
changing "I have not gotten any cooperation" to "Alex has made private
and public requests to the CDDL stewards but received no response."
More information about the License-discuss