License Committee Report for September 2005

David Barrett dbarrett at
Thu Sep 8 21:08:40 UTC 2005

Russell Nelson wrote:
> The OVPL consists of two sets of changes to the CDDL.  One set changes
> policy, and the other set changes implementation.  I have suggested
> that in order for the OVPL to not be duplicative and to increase its
> readability, its implementation changes should actually go into the
> CDDL.  I've asked the submittor to work with the CDDL stewards to get
> those improvements into the CDDL.  I have not gotten any cooperation.
> Instead, he has asked me to submit the OVPL as-is.

Incidentally, I think this is a fair summary, but I would suggest 
changing "I have not gotten any cooperation" to "Alex has made private 
and public requests to the CDDL stewards but received no response."


More information about the License-discuss mailing list