LGPL vs GPLv2
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Fri May 20 11:59:03 UTC 2005
Zeno Davatz scripsit:
> Ok, thanks for all the replies. So there is actually no big difference
> between GPL and the GPLv2? Is that correct?
"GPL" is understood to mean GPLv2; the GPLv1 was current only between 1989
and 1991, and very few pieces of software are still licensed under it.
In any case, it differs only verbally from GPLv2.
> So actually the main difference is still between GPL/GPLv2 vs LGPL.
If you understand, John Cowan
things are just as they are; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
if you do not understand, http://www.reutershealth.com
things are just as they are. jcowan at reutershealth.com
More information about the License-discuss