Which license is recommended?
Alan Rihm
alan at rihm.com
Wed Mar 23 20:06:44 UTC 2005
If we put our copyright notice in the UI, would that address the issue?
Does the Adaptive Public License address this issue
(http://opensource.org/licenses/apl1.0.php)?
How about the Apple Public Source License
(http://opensource.org/licenses/apsl-2.0.php)?
Russell Nelson wrote:
>Alan Rihm writes:
> > Please recommend a license that does the following:
> >
> > Requires any of our notices, including our "Powered By" tag, to remain
> > in the UI (and source code) of our software.
>
>There is no already-approved license which does that. In order to
>accomplish that you'll have to assert that your copyright covers
>public performances (that is to say, construction of a web page).
>Copyright law gives you control over that, although I don't know of
>anybody who actually tries to control it. You might find people
>resistant to the idea, and since you WANT people to use your code, you
>might not be successful.
>
>You'll need to contact a lawyer.
>
>There's certainly precedent for language that requires the non-removal
>of notices; the GPL requires that an interactive program print its
>copyright and GPL permission notice when it starts up.
>
>
>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list