Are implicit dual-licensing agreements inherently anti-open?

[Alex Bligh]

--On 19 July 2005 17:31 -0700 David Barrett <dbarrett at quinthar.com> wrote:

> Would you agree with this summary?  If not, how would you enumerate what
> remains to be discussed on this list before it's left to the OSI board to
> make a judgement?

No - Andrew is (as I understand it) still contending that the OVPL is less
enforceable than other bare reciprocal licenses, and I am interested in
bottoming out why he thinks that. IE I think there is another live issue.

Alex