Request for advice on license drafting
Alvin Oga
alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com
Tue Feb 8 03:16:28 UTC 2005
hi ya
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, chris yoo wrote:
> Thank you very much for your reply.
>
> > They can not be released from source code distribution. Anyone who
> > redistributes software must use the same license, under Def. 7. No rights
> > can be removed for the redistributed license.
>
> I disagree.
nothing to disagree ?? ( i think its 2 different animals )
one license requires that the derivatives can be distributed with the
same license terms you received ...
bsd-style license allows you a whole other list of rights to do as one
wishes
i keep wondering .. why don't people talk to a GPL-competent lawyer
and have them draw up the license ...
although one can write up one's own license and but i;m not sure
about other people use the original author's license on other works
- where is the gray line of "practicing law" without a license,
if you'd pardon the punn, start to come in before it is not
long a license for ones own products vs generally used by othes
for unrelated stuff
c ya
alvin
> My understanding was that many open source licences (e.g.
> Free BSD, Apache) allowed for the re-distribution or sublicensing of
> software under different terms to the license under which the software
> was originally distributed. In fact, some allow you to re-distribute
> the software under a proprietary license.
>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list