For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
Mahesh T. Pai
paivakil at yahoo.co.in
Sun Dec 11 06:51:22 UTC 2005
Brendan Scott said on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:58:08PM +1100,:
> The third is that OSI has plenty of applications for approval. It
> should therefore give priority to those which are likely to be
> practically implemented. In this respect, having a third party
> submit a license does not inspire confidence. The copyright holder
> ought to be proposing the license for approval and stating an
> intention to use.
Has the OSI ever insisted that licenses should be submitted by the
party issuing it?
I recall somebody posting here that anybody may post a license for
approval.
I am not very keen of the Microsoft license, but asking only to avoid
complaints of double standards.
--
Mahesh T. Pai
He is wise who knows the sources of knowledge --
who knows who has written and where it is to be found.
--A.A. Hodge
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list