OVPL & "Otherwise Make Available" (was RE: Change ot topic,back to OVPL)
Lawrence Rosen
lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Fri Aug 26 20:28:22 UTC 2005
> > External deployment occurs in the OSL when the software is
> > "used by anyone other than You," not when it merely
> delivers email to
> > those people.
>
> Does the prior discussion change this?
Not yet.
> I think the OSL would apply to the people responsible for
> setting up the mail server at their organization, assuming
> they were to run SMTP software licensed under the OSL. But
> the OSL would not be applicable to people sending mail *to* that site.
More precisely, the SMTP software licensed under the OSL would be considered
*distributed* to the people responsible for setting up the mail server at
their organization (whether that is *external* depends on how "You" is
defined), but *not distributed* to people (e.g., named Joe Friendly
Stranger) sending mail *to* that site.
> And it would also not apply to Jane Random User who simply
> sends mail via her organization's SMTP server...?
I think, in common parlance, we often say that Jane is "using her
organization's SMTP server" to process her email. So if Jane is an employee,
she's part of "You." If Jane is a public user of an ISP ("You") that
provides SMTP services to the public, then I'd call that an "external
deployment."
I think we need to distinguish Jane Random User from the Joe Friendly
Stranger who just happens to send Jane some email.
Is that closer?
/Larry
Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, technology law offices (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482
707-485-1242 * fax: 707-485-1243
Author of "Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and
Intellectual Property Law" (Prentice Hall 2004)
[Available also at www.rosenlaw.com/oslbook.htm]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:chuck at codefab.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:47 AM
> To: lrosen at rosenlaw.com
> Cc: license-discuss at opensource.org
> Subject: Re: OVPL & "Otherwise Make Available" (was RE:
> Change ot topic,back to OVPL)
>
> Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> >> Is making the output of a program publicly available "external
> >> deployment"?
> >
> > In OSL, no.
>
> Agreed.
>
> >> Is making a program available for remote execution "external
> >> deployment"?
> >
> > In OSL, yes.
> >
> > Or at least that's what I intended. Do you also read
> section 5 that way?
> > (See www.rosenlaw.com/DRAFT-OSL3.0.pdf.)
>
> Yes, I read it that way.
>
> OK. Let's return to an earlier comment:
>
> > Nope. External deployment occurs in the OSL when the software is
> > "used by anyone other than You," not when it merely
> delivers email to
> > those people.
>
> Does the prior discussion change this?
>
> I think the OSL would apply to the people responsible for
> setting up the mail server at their organization, assuming
> they were to run SMTP software licensed under the OSL. But
> the OSL would not be applicable to people sending mail *to* that site.
>
> And it would also not apply to Jane Random User who simply
> sends mail via her organization's SMTP server...?
>
> --
> -Chuck
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list