Bruce Perens rejected from license-proliferation committee.
Russell Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Mon Aug 22 21:25:15 UTC 2005
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> It will take those people a lot more digging to understand that
> there is no real feedback mechanism from the community to the OSI.
You realize that I merely have to reply to this email to falsify this
statement? It doesn't matter what I say. I could say "flibberty
flobberty foo" and I still prove you wrong.
> Why shouldn't the OSI seek to be more open to the community which
> it claims to represent?
Yes, we ought to reply to people's email.
(Ian, thanks for sending these softball objections. The check is in
the mail.)
> Besides, restaurants are a lousy analogy, since there are many
> restaurants, but only one OSI.
There's the FSF. There's OSDL. There's OMM, AES, and NFLX. Oh,
wait, those are stocks that I own, but you know what I mean.
> Nobody voted for RMS or Eben. But that's OK, because they don't claim
> to represent anybody except themselves.
One of the reasons that I stay on the OSI board is that I feel that I
am the only representative of the individual self-supporting
developer. I am representative without anybody having voted for me.
Why do people put such stock in voting? Democratic representation is
no guarantee of quality of governance.
> Do you really not see the difference between the FSF, which is
> "dedicated to promoting computer users' rights to use, study, copy,
> modify, and redistribute computer programs," and the OSI, which is
> "dedicated to managing and promoting the Open Source Definition for
> the good of the community?"
Not particularly. There are differences which I refuse to go into,
but this is an area in which we both claim to be representing the
interests of people we've never met.
--
--my blog is at blog.russnelson.com | with some experience
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | you know what to do.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | with more experience
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | | you know what not to do.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list