"Open Source Constitution"?
bruce at perens.com
Sat Apr 9 19:05:35 UTC 2005
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Those people  who see a strong distinction between Microsoft
> selling a product containing Open Source Software such as zlib and
> IPFW; Red Hat selling a product containing OSS such as the Linux
> kernel and a mix of GNU and BSD-licensed userland utilities; or Apple
> selling a product containing OSS such as the Mach kernel plus a mix of
> BSD and GNU utilities; are applying double standards.
This paragraph seems to avoid the major distinction, which is the
proprietary component of the work.
More information about the License-discuss