Licensing options for firmware
scott at opentrac.org
Wed Apr 6 18:02:27 UTC 2005
It's not strictly necessary for my purposes. I want to benefit the user
community, but if manufacturers want to use the code, they can either
contribute something worthwhile or pay for a commercial license. Ordinarily
the GPL would do that (a la MySQL), but it just won't cut it when we're
talking about separate hardware modules.
I'll look into Sleepycat.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ernest Prabhakar" <prabhaka at apple.com>
To: "Joel West" <svosrp at gmail.com>
Cc: <scott at opentrac.org>; <license-discuss at opensource.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Licensing options for firmware
> Hmm. Last I checked the Sleepycat license was not "open source" --
> is my understanding out of date, or does that not matter for your
> -- Ernie P.
More information about the License-discuss