For Approval: Some License Or Another
Alvin Oga
alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com
Tue Nov 30 01:58:36 UTC 2004
hi ya chuck
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Lawrence Rosen wrote:
..
> I value the contributions you have made, and I hope you chose to comment on
> issues which interest you in the future.
i think we all do :-)
> It seems perfectly reasonable to me that an author of a software program who
> wants to "share" it with other people might want to write a license which
> describes the terms they want their software to be shared under.
i equate that to :
- a software programmer writing a legal document is the equivalent
to a lawyer writing complicated software code
- the end result will be a direct result of one's understanding of
the issues at hand and one can do it oneself or solicit input
from those that do it for a living
- by the same token, one must undrstand all the issues to talk to
the lawyers to draw up a license that is binding in the target
market
the part i like; if a lawer is paid to write a legal doc, they
presumably know what they are doing and they presumably have
liability insurance if they "screw up" in a big way, that an
entry level attorney wouldn't have made those mistakes
somewhere along the line, due my foggy crystal ball, i suspect there
probably will be a test case, wrt to "licenses" :
"practicing law without a license"
c ya
alvin
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list