Definition of open source
nelson at crynwr.com
Mon Nov 8 03:15:24 UTC 2004
Alan Rihm writes:
> Rick, I'm not sure why there is so much anger in the room ("I smell a
> second rat in this conversation"...that is just ignorant). I believe in
> open source based on today's terms. It got us here after all, but surely
> it is healthy to discuss alternative views.
You're not "discussing". You're diluting OSI's well-known trademark
on "open source". If I were you, I would cease and disist doing this.
Same thing for you, Harrell. If you're using a license which is not
approved by OSI, it's not an "open source" license.
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | Violence never solves
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | problems, it just changes
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 212-202-2318 voice | them into more subtle
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | FWD# 404529 via VOIP | problems.
More information about the License-discuss