Definition of open source

Rick Moen rick at
Sun Nov 7 01:47:24 UTC 2004

Quoting Zvezdan Petkovic (zvezdan at CS.WM.EDU):

> I know.  The way he was proposing it, it was an oxymoron.  I just
> tried to be concise.  There have been enough long posts on the topic
> already.

Sorry for jumping on you.  I just get tired of the assertion that open
source is inherently "non-commercial" -- often floated by the various
people coming to this list and posting special-pleading requests that
OSI change its core nature for their special benefit.  You were directly
supporting their stance.

More information about the License-discuss mailing list